By Lisa MacKay, Assistant Vice President, Senior Claims Examiner, Berkley Alliance Managers, a Berkley Company
Liz Molina, Assistant Vice President, Senior Claims Examiner, Berkley Alliance Managers, a Berkley Company
June 21, 2024
As claims handlers, we always look for reasonable opportunities to resolve our claims. Mediation is the most common and beneficial pathway to claims resolution. Most professional liability policies offer incentives for insureds to attend mediation and resolve their disputes. Moreover, mediation provides a means to foster and preserve relationships with insured clients. There are occasions when we can socialize, share some ideas, interact and even find common ground with other insurance professionals as well as attorneys. This ability to connect with others and with the help of a neutral third party or mediator, gives us some control over the outcome of a case and avoids the unknown risk of a decision being rendered by a judge or jury.
With social inflation on the rise and sometimes resulting in extreme jury awards, resolution through mediation is the best way to take the uncertainty and risk of the outcome out of the hands of the judge or jury. The interactive process promotes a free flow of information and allows parties to identify and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the case in a confidential setting. The mediator assists the parties in exploring legal issues and in evaluating the recoverability of certain damage items that may not have been discussed. An effective mediator also helps to narrow the gap between alleged damages, which are sometimes overstated, and what would ultimately be recoverable to move the parties closer together and to assist them with becoming better informed to evaluate risk and exposure.
For many people, whether the case involves a personal or professional matter, having a dispute that rises to the level of a claim whether litigated or not, is a new and unfamiliar experience, and often “uncharted territory.” The claim and litigation process can be intimidating, uncomfortable, frustrating and disappointing. This experience is also true in mediation. For example in negotiations, unreasonable opening offers can lead to frustration and irritation and cause parties to become more entrenched and unwilling to concede their position. It is not a natural process to most and there is a lot of gamesmanship and strategy on all sides. We often have preliminary conversations with our insured clients and counsel to set the tone and keep an open mind as we prepare ourselves for unrealistic opening demands. The valuation of a case or position becomes more realistic after discussions or back-and-forth offers are made in mediation. The process itself may take more than one session, especially if the parties are entrenched, to allow them time to process the information and better evaluate risk and exposure.
(more…)
